Name
Romanov Dmitry Alexandrovich
Scholastic degree
•
Academic rank
—
Honorary rank
—
Organization, job position
Kuban State Technological University
Web site url
—
—
Articles count: 12
The purpose of the research is development of the new methods of diagnostic the research activities productivity. It is known, that for the evaluation the productivity of a scientist we usually use a well-known index of Hirsch, the introduction of which in 2005 was a significant step forward compared with application of this index as the ratio of the number of references to works of scientist and publications themselves. At the same time even h-index as an indicator is not flawless, the main flaw is weak differential ability: a number of links to the most cited publications of the scientific worker does not matter after reaching a certain threshold. It is necessary to develop a method of estimating the productivity of scientific worker, which preserves dignities of h-index and removes its shortcomings. This will allow evaluating the productivity of research activities more objectively. Methodological bases of the research: a systematic approach (considering the science as a social institution in close connection with the society as a whole), a metasystem approach (considering the results of the scientific activities as a metasystem, i.e. the system with relatively independent components), probabilistic and statistical approach (considering the research activities as the random process), a synergistic approach (considering science like a self-organized system) qualimetric approach (considering the productivity of scientific activity as latent variables that reflect a variety of criteria)
The purpose of the investigation is students’ conflictological competence assessment method elaboration. The methodological foundations are system approach (considered the pedagogical monitoring as education quality management component), personal oriented approach (focused the educational process on student persona), competence oriented approach (oriented the educational process to personally-professional abilities formation which integrated the knowledge, skills, motives, values and ability to their control) and quality measurement approach (we have considered the conflictological competence preparedness as a multi-criterion parameter). The theoretical foundations are socially-philosophic works dedicated to students’ conflictological competence formation, and pedagogical works, dedicated to education quality management. The normative foundations of investigation are Law “About Education” (2012), state educational standards for vocational training (2009), “Strategy of state youth policy in Russian Federation”, state program “Patriotic education of Russian Federation citizens during 2011-2015”. The methods of investigation are scientific literature and pedagogical practice analysis, survey, modeling, pedagogical monitoring, quality measurement and complex systems polyvalent analysis
The purpose of the research is the development of new methods of the estimation of the importance of scientific journals. It is known that for assessing the significance of scientific journals it is used a universally recognized impact factor, which reflects the average number of citations to the articles published in the magazine for a certain period of time. For a more objective assessment of the significance of the journal in the scientific community we use such indicator as the index of efficiency, which reflects how quickly the articles in the scientific community published in the journal become known and recognized. At the same time, the impact factor as one of the scientometric indices has inherent definite disadvantages, the main of which - the stimulation scientific edition to the artificial reduction of the number of published articles, instead of increasing demands to improve their scientific level. It is necessary to develop a method of assessing the significance of the journal for the scientific community, preserving the dignity of the impact factor and reduce its disadvantages. Application of extra scientometric indicators, in addition to the impact factor and the index of efficiency, will allow assessing the importance of the journal for the scientific community more objectively. Methodological bases of the research are: a systematic approach (considering science as a social institution in close connection with the society as a whole), metasystem approach (considering the scientific community as a metasystem, i.e. a system with a relatively independent components), qualimetric approach (considering the importance of the scientific journal as a latent variables that reflect a variety of criteria), sociological approach (considering the scientific publication as a social system, the intensity of interaction with other society)
The purpose of research – the development of models
and methods of multiparametrical diagnostic the
research activities of scientific and pedagogical
collectives of educational institutions. The
problematics of research is improving the quality and
productivity (the efficiency) of research activities in
educational institutions. The problem of research is the
question of how to objectively and comprehensively
(in a complex) diagnose the research activities of
scientific and pedagogical collectives? The urgency of
solving specified problem is caused by the need to
ensuring a close relationship between research,
methodological and educational activities in
educational institutions. We have also to consider the
increasing role of clusters in the Russian economy,
cooperation and integration levels (steps) a system of
continuous education, etc. The authors identified the
parameters reflecting significance of research activities
of the scientific and the pedagogical collectives for the
scientific and educational community (social megaenvironmental).
When allocating indicators the authors
took into account that science - the social and cultural
phenomenon and the social institution, and the most
important aspect of the significance of the research
activity - in the innovative development of various
spheres of human activity. The applied methods of
research: mathematical modeling; methods of the
theory of graphs, sets and relations; methods of
"artificial intelligence" and the multi-parameter analysis of systems; methods of quality control (theory
of latent variables). Methodological bases of research:
systemic, cultural, competence, metasystem,
sociological, qualimetric and synergetic approaches
The purpose of this research is the development of
models and methods of multiparameter diagnostic
effectiveness of educational environments. We know,
that a criterion-diagnostic system for monitoring the
effectiveness of higher education institutions -
educational Macromedia is being designed, which is
not the monitoring of the effectiveness of educational
microenvironments and meso-environment -
departments and faculties. The issue of the research -
to increase the productivity (efficiency) of functioning
of educational environments. The problem of research
is the question of how to diagnose the effectiveness of
educational environments objectively and
comprehensively. The urgency of this problem is due
to: the need to ensure the effective functioning of
educational institutions, their sustainable innovative
development; increasing demand for general and
vocational education, as well as its transition to a
multi-level system. Methodological basis of the
research: a competence-based approach (considered an
important target value of the educational process
formation of the competences and personal and professional qualities of students, integrating
knowledge, skills and readiness for their effective use
in solving of life, professional and educational
problems), metasystem approach (considering the
educational environment as a metasystem, including
relatively independent subsystems - educational
environment of lower level of the hierarchy),
qualimetric approach (considering the effectiveness of
the educational environment as an integrative figure,
which is diagnosed on the basis of estimating a set of
criteria), synergetic approach (considering the
educational environment as a self-organizing system,
and the efficiency of its functioning - as an indicator of
the success of the use of resources for further
development). Synergetic approach is relatively new in
the evaluation of the effectiveness of the educational
process and the educational environment as a whole
The article presents the criteria for evaluating the
integration of researchers in the scientific community,
based on an analysis of its citations. It is known, that
one of the major components of interscientific
communication (communication in the scientific
community) is a citation of scientific publications
(monographs, articles, etc.). According to the
sociological approach, a scientist is a part of society, ie,
scientific community; under scientific community we
understand scientific mega environment (opposed to
research groups of institutions and their structural units).
Integration of a researcher to the community has many
aspects: on the one hand, it is - the importance of his
work to the scientific community, on the other hand, it is - the use of a scientist social mega environment for
building for their personal and professional
development to improve their research and improve the
quality of its results (in the context of the article we will
consider the second aspect). Methodological bases of
the research: systematic, competence, sociological, and
mega-system qualimetric approaches. Methods:
modeling, methods of quality control, methods of set
theory, relations and graphs. Evaluation (diagnostics)
involvement of scientists in the scientific community -
is more complicated metrology task than the evaluation
of the significance of the results of its research
activities. For the authors it is clear that a mature
scientist (with a high level of research competence)
should intensively use the potential of the social and the
cultural science international environment (community)
for their personal and professional development, to
improve the efficiency of this research activities and the
quality of this results. The proposed indicators can be
considered as group indicator variables reflecting the
level of the behavioral component of the research
competence (scientist). Using social media for
researcher’s potential – it is necessary, but not sufficient
condition for productive research, producing goodquality
scientific results. In this situation, negative
prognosis is more significant: poor use of social media
for researcher’s potential – is a "guarantee" for low
productivity of this research activities and the low
quality of this results. Only the combination of the
highest levels of readiness for research (research
competence) with high levels of other competences (as a
whole - the social and professional competence,
implying the presence of the professional skills of selforganization)
can be the factors of successful research
The article presents the criteria for the effectiveness of
the scientific and pedagogical workers of higher skill
levels for the preparation of scientific and pedagogical
staff. It is known that the preparation of the teaching
staff (PhDs) - one of the most important activities of
higher education institutions; Moreover, when the state
accreditation of higher education institutions
compulsorily taken into account indicators that reflect
the impact of training candidates. Also, of course, that the training of the teaching staff (PhDs) - activities that
require both high levels of research and pedagogical
competence. This means that the results of scientific and
teaching staff higher qualification levels for the
preparation of the scientific staff - both indicators of
research and pedagogical competence; own training of
researchers - an area of "crossing" of scientific and
pedagogical activity. Unfortunately, the increase in the
number of scientific personnel being prepared does not
always mean quality growth. Often trained scientific
personnel (PhD) not only do not approach the level of
competence of its research (the results of research) to
the supervisor, and stopped to engage in scientific
activities after defending his doctoral dissertation (or
engaged at a low level). Therefore, the article authors
consider it expedient to propose indicators that reflect
not only the amount and timeliness of the research
training (PhD thesis defense sometimes occur many
years after graduate school), but also the productivity of
this activity. From the point of view of the authors, the
success of research training only can be considered
productive when prepared by the scientific supervisor
candidates of sciences are highly qualified scientific
personnel, ie conduct high-level research, the results of
which are recognized by the scientific community; the
same is true of the scientific advice (highly qualified
scientific workers - doctors). The practical significance
of the study results - in the possibility of objective
monitoring of research activity of scientific-pedagogical
personnel of higher qualification. Methodological bases
of research: a systematic, competence, sociological, and
metasystem qualimetric approaches. Methods:
modeling, methods of quality control, methods of set
theory, relations and graphs. Normative base of
research: the Federal Law "On Education" (2012), the
federal state educational standards of higher education
(2014, 2015). The work was performed as part of
research projects "Monitoring of the research activities
of educational institutions in the information society"
(№ 16-03-00382) and "Modern information and
educational environment" (16-36-00048) with the
financial support of the Russian Humanitarian
Foundation from 17.03. 2016.
The purpose of the research is development of models
and methods of diagnostics of methodical competence
of a teacher. According to modern views, methodical
thinking is the key competence of teachers. Modern
experts consider the methodical competence of a
teacher as a personal and professional quality, which is
a fundamentally important factor in the success of the
professional activity of teachers, as well as a
subsystem of its professional competence. This is due
to the fact that in today's world, a high level of
knowledge of teachers of academic subjects and their
possessing of learnt basics of teaching methods can not
fully describe the level of professional competence of
the teacher. The authors have characterized the
functional components of methodical competence of
the teacher, its relationship with other personalprofessional
qualities (first - to the psychological and
educational, research and informational competence),
as well as its levels of formation. Forming a model of
methodical competence of the teacher, the authors
proceeded from the fact that a contemporary teacher
high demands: it must be ready to conduct independent
research, design-learning technologies, forecasting
results of training and education of students. As a
leading component of the methodical competence of
the teacher is his personal experience in
methodological activities and requirements of
methodical competence determined goals and
objectives of methodical activity, the process of the
present study, the formation of patterns of methodical
competence of the teacher preceded the refinement of
existing models methodical activity of scientific and
pedagogical staff of higher education institutions and
secondary vocational education institutions. The
proposed model of methodical competence of the
teacher - the scientific basis of a system of monitoring
of his personal and professional development, and
evaluation criteria and levels of her diagnosis - targets
system of vocational training and re-training of high
school teachers. Innovation policy is a model of
methodical competence of the teacher, and the main
model of the mechanism of its formation - methodical
activity (in close connection with other activities).
Research methods: analysis of scientific and
methodical literature and best practice methodological
activities in educational institutions, modeling,
methods of the theory of sets and relations, methods of
quality control, methods of multivariate analysis
systems. Methodological bases of research: a
systematic, qualimetric, competence and process
approaches. The work was performed as part of
research projects "Monitoring of the research activities
of educational institutions in the information society"
(№ 16-03-00382) and "Modern information and
educational environment" (16-36-00048) with the
financial support of the Russian Humanitarian
Foundation from 17.03. 2016
In the article we have reflected a relationship between
the parameters of the research activities of scientific
and pedagogical collectives and the characteristics of
the educational environment in higher education. It is
known that the research activities of scientific and
pedagogical workers and teams - an integral part
functioning of the higher education institution (and
improving its efficiency is one of the most important
problems). The authors proved that parameters
reflecting research activity of scientific and
pedagogical higher education of institution employees
characterize the aspects of the educational
environment as its latitude, intensity, social activity,
coherence, mobility, stability, reliability and
efficiency. It is caused by the fact that the research
activities of scientific and pedagogical workers - a
multifaceted social and cultural phenomenon. The idea
of the diagnosis of the educational environment of a higher educational institution and its structural units,
based on an assessment of scientometric indicators
(criteria for research productivity), can be completely
suitable for international and Russian requirements:
the well-known Shanghai procedure shifts the
emphasis on the evaluation of various aspects of the
research activities in higher education; serious
attention to assessing the research activity focuses and
Russian technique diagnostic efficiency of higher
education institutions. This is logical and soundly: if
the educational environment of a higher educational
institution is not a center of science, then it cannot
have effectively and competitive graduates, because
Research and pedagogical staff - the governing factor
in the educational process. Based on previously
developed models of research activities in scientific
and pedagogical collectives, as well as on generally
accepted models of educational environments, the
authors have proposed a method for the diagnosis of
the educational environment, based on an assessment
of scientometric indicators - parameters reflecting the
impact of the research activities of scientific and
pedagogical workers. Obtained results may be the
theoretical basis for further scientific understanding of
the problem of increasing the productivity of research
activities in higher education, as well as problems -
increasing the competitiveness of educational
environments. The practical significance of the results
of this study - the possibility of their use in the system
of socio-pedagogical monitoring - monitoring of
productivity the research activities and effectiveness of
educational environments. Methods of investigation:
modeling, methods of the theory of sets and relations,
methods of probability theory and mathematical
statistics, methods of the theory of limits, methods of
linear algebra and analytic geometry, multi-parameter
analysis of the systems and methods of quality control
(latent variables theory). Methodological bases of
research: a systematic, metasystem, qualimetric,
sociological and probabilistic and statistical
approaches
The article presents the new criteria suitable for the
diagnosis of the productivity of research and the
importance of its results for the scientific community, are resistant to artificially "improve". It is known that
generally accepted measure of the productivity of
research scientists is the h-index, which is calculated
based on a statistical method of scree. This indicator is
applicable to research teams (organizations). However,
the h-index and a number of other scientometric
indicators based on citation, are easy to be artificially
increased (fraudulent schemes action). New
scientometric parameters adequately reflecting the
importance of research results, and not amenable (or
very difficult to) to be artificially "improved" are
therefore needed; moreover, it is recognized around
the world: the true score (not fictitious) of the
significance of the results of a research scientist for the
scientific community - is a complex metrological
(scientometric) task. The authors argued that such
indicators are primarily index latitude demand for
research results, as well as a number of other
parameters of copyright. Despite the fact that authors
indicators, the same as the h-index are based on
citation, their large values indicate that the scientific
community recognizes the results of the research
activities of scientific and pedagogical workers;
moreover, these indicators can be considered as a
criterion to identify really promising (productive)
researchers. The problem of adequate assessment of
the productivity of research activities and the
significance of its results, the authors consider in the
context of the problems (larger problems) of the
effectiveness of educational environments. The
practical significance of research results lies in the
possibility of their use for constructing criteriondiagnostic
apparatus for monitoring research activities
of scientific institutions (including higher educational
institutions). Research methodology: systemic, metasystemic,
probabilistic-statistical and qualitative
approaches. Research methods: cognitive, structural,
functional, and mathematical modeling; methods of
graph theory, sets and relations; system-cognitive
analysis; methods of quality control (theory of latent
variables); methods of probability theory and
mathematical statistics (first of all – a method of
scree), methods of analytical geometry; methods of the
mathematical theory of limits