Name
Valieva Arina Rafailevna
Scholastic degree
—
Academic rank
—
Honorary rank
—
Organization, job position
Kazan Federal University
Web site url
—
—
Articles count: 1
Level analysis of law enforcement cooperation
between private legal and public legal origins was
conducted in the aspect of dual nature of dispositivity
in court jurisdictional process. On the basis of
legislation’s investigation it is found that the
apprehension of dispositivity on doctrinal level as the
principle of judicial process, restricted by private legal
aspect, doesn’t correspond to its legal dual-nature. It is
showed that cohesive perception of dispositivity in
court jurisdictional process is possible under the
condition of its binary perception based on
investigation of its private legal and public legal
origins, providing their harmonic unanimity in the
framework of dualistic approach. It the article it has
been stated that even under the conditions of court
process’ parties’ interests’ contradiction their
warrants may be realized only under their cooperation
with each other, which needs court’s contribution in
the providing of their rights’ realization on equal
terms. It is educed by researches that the cooperation
of private legal and public legal origins of dispositivity
is conducted on two (horizontal and vertical) levels of
their law enforcement connections. Herewith the
coordination of court process’ parties between each
other occurs on horizontal level of cooperation, while
the subordination of parties’ collaboration with the
court occurs on the vertical level. The analysis of
procedural legislation has educed general regularities
of private legal and public legal origins of dispositivity
in court jurisdictional process for different types of
judicial proceedings. These regularities are: the
realization of private legal origin, represented by the
parties, with the relevancy stipulates the demand for
public legal origin of dispositivity, represented by the
court; the realization of public legal origin of
dispositivity, represented by the court, with the
relevancy stipulates the demand for private legal origin
of dispositivity, represented by the parties of judicial
process