The article examines the process of secularization of
Church property in the history of the world. Special
attention is paid to the assumptions of the preparation
of secularizing reforms in the Russian state since the
policy of Joann III. We address the relationship
between Church and state in the field of Church lands
and ecclesiastical jurisdiction authorized in Stoglav in
1551, and in the judgment of the Council estates in
1581 and 1584. The article studies the reasons, under
which it became necessary, in conditions of the
emerging absolutism, to limit the Church's estates; the
ecclesiastical jurisdiction in this connection, there was
issued the national Code – “Sobornoye ulozheniye” of
1649. The study discusses the limitation of economic
and administrative privileges of the Church in
accordance with the Council code of Tsar Alexei
Mikhailovich. The article focuses on the
administrative and financial functions of the Monastic
Order. We have also made a distinction, and there are
differences in the powers between the Monastic
Orders 1649 and between recreated Monastic Order in
1701. The article discusses the mission of the Church
reform of Peter I the Great and the results of this
reform, which prepared the legislative framework for
the secularizing reforms of Catherine II the Great
The article discusses the concept of species, the
essential terms and the grounds of the pledge in
Indian law, and especially the pledge agreement in the
legal practice of India
The article questions of a legal regulation of standards of the family and civil legislation of guardianship establishment over minors, about implementation and protections of their rights, are considered the problems arising at practical realization of the relevant standards are considered
This article is important today because there is not
enough attention in the contemporary law publications
paid to the typical patterns of crime mechanism
especially in the sphere of illegal weapon and
ammunition turnover. Taking into account the
opinions of such well-known forensic scientists as
R.S. Belkin, V.D. Zelensky, G.M. Meretukov, M.V.
Golovin, V.A. Obraztsov, J.G. Korukhov, V.Y.
Koldin, O.V. Chelysheva, L.Y. Drapkin, V.N.
Karagodin and others, the author comes to the
conclusion that it’s necessary to develop typical
patterns of crime mechanism for certain types of
crime. The author has worked out some typical
patterns of crime mechanism in the sphere of illegal
weapon and ammunition turnover based upon major
informative criminalistic elements, this particular
article describes seven typical patterns of crime
mechanism for the illegal storage, transportation,
transfer, carry, purchase and sale, manufacture, repair
or alteration, theft or extortion, careless storage or
improper performance of duties on protection of
weapon, its basic parts and ammunition. Each pattern
is accompanied with the examples of judicial and
investigative practice, followed by the necessary
explanations and analysis of the activities of the
subject of the investigation on the preparation, followup
and final stages, which leads to the conclusion
about the legitimacy of the proposed patterns
The article covers the problems of procedural status and functions of a forensic investigator taking into account the provisions of p. 40 (1) art.5 of the Criminal Code, comparing with the previous position of the criminal procurators. The author suggests the wording of a new article 38(1) of the Criminal Code as a “forensic investigator” and defines his procedural status. Thus, a forensic investigator at the pre-trial proceedings should have the following powers: according to the investigator’s decision (the head of the investigation team or the head of the investigative body starting the production of a case) he could be entitled to authorize the investigative and other procedures, as well as the participation in the investigation along with the investigator, in order to ensure the proper application of scientific and technical tools and procedural recordings during the investigation, addressing experts for help and cooperation with forensic institutions, and the use of the advanced features of forensic examinations; introduction of new science and technology excellence in the detection and investigation of crime; development of scientific-methodological and practical recommendations for the detection and investigation of crimes
Relation of correctional institutions staff to the reformation of industrial-production complex
of criminal-executive system and processes of humanization of legislature to the concern of imprisoned persons in places of incarceration is investigated in the article. Degree of above
mentioned processes influence on production- economic activity of institutions is determined.
The article deals with the main reasons, which
obstruct the ability of citizens to realize their
birthright on a necessary defense in the protection
of family members and minors. The article has paid
attention to the importance of the criminological
characteristics of the crimes, with an aim to develop
measures on prevention of criminality. The author
has analyzed socio – demographic characteristics of
the individual, who can use the right of necessary
defense for guard family members and minors,
based on key descriptions (gender, age, level of
education, occupation, marital status. There is a
proposed change in the article 37 of the criminal
code, with a new category of persons – family
members and minors. The author also suggests
reducing the size of the criminal responsibility, in
the article 108 and 114 of the criminal code of the
Russian Federation, to one year for persons who
exceeded the limits of necessary defense, when they
protect family members and minors
The analysis of civil-law norms provided in the fourth part of civil procedure law of Russia allows to express opinion that apprehended and embodied by civil procedure law in sphere of regulation of the right to results of intellectual activity and individualization instruments in the criminal law is not reflected in full, in particular, in article 146 of the criminal code of Russian Federation.
There were presented the results of research carried out by the author in the article, that is assessment
of trustworthiness of evidence with case at bar.
The author drew a conclusion about necessity
of criminal- commitment procedure legislature
improvement, in particular, pronouncement of
sentence in the case of rejection of public prosecutor
from maintenance of accusation in court on the basis
of scientific and special literature, in particular,
works of O.L.Vasilieva,Yu.K.Orlova,
A.E. Merkusheva, P.A. Lupinskaya, V.Zazhitsky,
I.B. Mikhailovsky, I.L. Petrukhina et al and with
an account of published and unpublished jurisdiction.
The aim of the article is to systematize by means of analyze overviews concerning the definitions of the guilt which exist in the jurisprudence, to examine
the questions of guilt forms influence on differentiation of legal liability measures, liability without guilt and to suggest the course of perfection of acting civil legislation and the practice of its application on the base of the examined material.