Name
Gritsenko Lubov Michaylovna
Scholastic degree
•
Academic rank
—
Honorary rank
—
Organization, job position
Tomsk Polytechnic University
Web site url
—
Articles count: 2
The relevance of the article is caused by the necessity
to form the linguacultural competence of foreign
students studying Russian language that corresponds to
the Contemporary didactics of foreign language
teaching. The case (precedent) texts are considered as
one of the main means of linguacultural orientation
used in practices of teaching Russian as a foreign
language. The necessity to study the case (precedent)
texts in this way is defined by its active use in
language and by the presence of cultural component
determining the valuable priorities of Russian vision of
the world. Therefore, the assimilation of case
(precedent) texts as actively used language elements of
Russian culture is the most important principle of
developing the communicative competence.
The aim of this work is the attempt to describe the case
(precedent) texts, acting as key material in the practice
of teaching Russian as a foreign language. The article
reveals the specificity of case (precedent) texts in the
context of national culture, it also identifies and
analyses their formal and semantic features, the
peculiarities of perception of the case (precedent) texts
by foreign students. The researching results of the
peculiarities of the case texts that are used in the
process of studying and teaching Russian as a foreign
language, allow drawing the conclusion that the
efficiency of assimilation of the considered units is
caused by knowledge of their structure and semantics,
by understanding the values, determined by them
The article analyzes the particular characteristics of
the logical and psychological sides of argumentation
as a means of a persuasive effect in the speech of a
public linguistic identity. The relevance of the
research is defined by the importance of problems of
studying the language of the given linguistic
identities. The novelty is in the aspect of setting the
problem of studying various types of public linguistic
identities and in involving previously unresearched
material. The object of study is a rhetorical speech
portrait of a public language identity (prosecutor).
The subject is particularities of logical and
psychological lines of reasoning as ways of
persuasive effect. The method used is scientific
description with elements of speech portraying,
observation. As a whole, the speech of the prosecutor
corresponds to the rhetorical canons, having a
standard logical composition: introduction, analysis
and evaluation of the evidence gathered in the case,
personality characteristics, conclusion. Various types
of logical and rhetorical (psychological) lines of
reasoning were distinguished in the course of the
analysis. It is found that the text is rich in affective
evaluation and metaphors. The general strategy is the
prevalence of the psychological side of persuasive
speech over the logical. The public language identity
chosen strategy turned out to be successful, i.e. it
made the speech expressive, original, assisting the formation of the judge's opinion in terms of
conviction