Scientific Journal of KubSAU

In the article theoretic and practical problems of the privatization of the state property, introduction of amendments to the privatization legislation of the Russian Federation and regulation of processes of privatization are analyzed. Рolitical and economic reasons for privatization of big enterprises are considered, same primary problems of the process of selling the publicly owned companies and of the state financial control over the privatization are revealed

The article is devoted to one of the most disputable categories of jurisprudence – to abuse by the right. The law does not allow the exercise of civil rights with the intent to harm another person, as well as abuse of rights in any form, including in the form of circumvention of the law. The author regards as the already known issues with the application of the principle of the inadmissibility of abuse of the right, so new in connection with the amendments to the Civil code of the Russian Federation. The amendments to the article on the abuse of rights were caused by the current practice. However, there remains a question about how well these novels are being implemented. This article examines the question of the application of the principle of prohibition of abuse of rights in proprietary relations. Statistics show that the judges started to apply Art. 10 ten times more often in proprietary relations. Still, this situation is inextricably intertwined with the risk of judicial discretion. The article also investigated the correlation of the subjective rights of a bona fide owner and a bona fide purchaser of real estate. Based on the conducted research the author proposes the notion of abuse of right in property relations. It is concluded that a proper understanding of the categories of "bona fide owner" and "bona fide purchaser" is the main factors in the resolution of a number of practical issues

A functional analysis of deposits at civil law allows comprehend its destination and role in developing the dynamic of a law regulation of a property circulation in conditions of market economy. The authors present their point of view about the deposit use possibility to provide a preliminary agreement in the civil law

The article is devoted to the analysis of the concept of legal capacity, which is one of the fundamental concepts in the science of civil law. The authors have covered approaches to the disclosure of this concept in the legal systems of foreign countries. The common features inherent in all considered variants of interpretation were revealed. Legal capacity is a sufficient criterion for establishing the fact of the legal existence of a legal entity. In accordance with Art. 17 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, legal capacity is the ability of an individual to have rights and bear responsibilities. The emergence of the legal capacity of an individual is determined by the moment of his birth (clause 2 of Article 17 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation). Accordingly, the termination of legal capacity is determined by the moment of biological death (clause 2 of Article 17 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation), since the subject of law no longer exists. If the person has been declared dead, but in fact is alive, this does not detract from his legal capacity, he automatically continues to use his legal capacity, respectively to enjoy the full range of rights and bear the responsibilities. In the scientific literature, both passive and active legal capacity are distinguished. The authors study different approaches, shows the lack of a common understanding of legal capacity, but all analyzed doctrinal approaches have a common feature - all reflections concern a certain person, his rights and duties. The authors concluded that the key component of legal capacity is the ability to be a subject of statutory rights and obligations

The article discusses the questions related to use of and disposing of a pledged subject by participants of a legal relationship, between depositors and pawnbrokers, in particular, new regulations about depositor’s rights who is a holder of the pledge subject