Scientific Journal of KubSAU

Polythematic online scientific journal
of Kuban State Agrarian University
ISSN 1990-4665
AGRIS logo UlrichsWeb logo DOAJ logo


Novozhilov Ivan Mikhailovich

Scholastic degree

Academic rank

Honorary rank

Organization, job position

Krasnodar Cooperative Institute

Web site url


Articles count: 2

Sort by: Date Title Views
195 kb


abstract 1291705066 issue 129 pp. 913 – 931 31.05.2017 ru 273
In the article we consider the methodological framework for the analysis of asset turnover; critical assessment of individual provisions of the traditional methods of analysis of capital turnover; a method to eliminate the influence of the price factor and the composition of current assets by results of approbation of an improved method for analyzing the turnover of circulating assets and own capital of business entities. The basis of the theory of capital turnover is the classic formula of the reproduction of capital by K.Marx, suggesting the increase of goods, money and money capital at the last stage of treatment, and improving the efficiency of the rational organization of the use, the rational level of concentration. The higher the speed of capital turnover, the more efficient its use is. The peculiarity of the process of the turnover of inventories, working capital is its dependence on specialization of business entities, defining the structure of fixed and current assets, ratio of reserves, participating and not participating in circulation during the reporting year. However, the traditional method of analysis of asset turnover, inventory does not distinguish between reserves for participating and non-participating in circulation during the reporting year, which precludes an accurate assessment of the process of circulation of assets to make the best management decision for their formation, to determine an objective rating of the business entity in its credit scoring. With regard to the method of analysis of asset turnover, inventory use of non-participating stocks in circulation during the reporting year, overstates the average annual total assets, inventory is the baseline for calculating the number of revolutions; inflated the average book value of assets, inventory, reduces the number of revolutions per year overstates the duration of one rotation of assets, stock, increases the capacity revenue (annual turnover) and, therefore, overestimates the need for assets, inventories, leading to inaccurate assessment of the release (raising) of assets stocks
154 kb


abstract 1151601057 issue 115 pp. 908 – 920 27.01.2016 ru 714
In the article we have given a critical assessment of credit scoring by American economist D. Duran, we have grounded the developing of his method for the domestic economic conditions. The unacceptability of D. Duran’s method for the analysis of financial condition of domestic economic entities is explained by the following reasons: 1) the imperfection of the hierarchy of indicators of credit scoring, and 2) the imperfection of differentiation of scoring for the actual value of the indicators, forming the credit scoring by groups of firms. In the methodology of D. Duran the main indicator is a level of credit scoring profitability of total assets - for the first class of firms, that are the most financially stable, the authors have given a rating of "50 points" for the actual value of the profitability of 30%; the second most important indicator by the author’s choice is the ratio of current liquidity - for the actual value of the coefficient "of 2.0 and higher," are given 30 points to a first-class firms; the third indicator of the financial condition of firms author has defined as the ratio of the financial independence - for the first group of firms the actual value of the coefficient "of 0.7 and higher," are assessed 20 points. In the fifth, the last group of firms, numerical score is 0 (for the actual return on total assets "of less than 1%", as the value of the current liquidity ratio "of 1.0 or less," for the coefficient of financial independence "less than 0.2"). For assessment of the financial condition of the domestic agricultural producers, a priority in the hierarchy of indicators, in our opinion, has the ratio of financial independence, which is formed mainly by retained earnings. Our researches have shown that the numerical score of the coefficient value "of 0.8 and above" should be 50 points. The second most important in the assessment of the financial condition of the organization, in our opinion, is the profitability of total assets; its actual value "of 5% and above" should correspond to score 30 points. The third in the system of indicators, characterizing the financial condition, is the ratio of current liquidity of the assets. Its actual value "of 3.2 and above" should be evaluated in 20 points for the agricultural organizations of the first, most financially stable, group