Name
Sergeenko Nina Leonidovna
Scholastic degree
•
Academic rank
professor
Honorary rank
—
Organization, job position
Kuban State Agrarian University
Web site url
—
—
Articles count: 6
Based on the analysis of the national literature about the migration of the peoples of the North Caucasus, the author concludes that the migration of highland people is changing in many ways the ethno-demographic situation; changing ethnic and cultural image of immi-grants, which, in turn, influenced the evolution of men-talities of highlanders. The dialogue with the new neighbors had mutually enriching character in general. The purpose of this article is to identify the impact of the migration on changing of the mentality of the peo-ples of the North Caucasus
Based on empirical data obtained through the sociological poll, we present the analysis of the identification system of the Krasnodar region. The article places civil, ethnic, religious, regional identity in the hierarchy of the identity of residents of the region, we have also carried out the analysis of subjective importance of the various types of identity
The authors analyze the results of the lessons and
consequences of the Great Patriotic War of 1941-1945
in the context of modernity, as well as falsification
attempts to distort, defame and otherwise detract the
role of the USSR in the victory over Nazi Germany.
They argue that the knowledge of the truth about the
Great Patriotic War gives us the opportunity not only
proud of the feat of their fathers and grandfathers, our
homeland, but also strengthen the belief in the great
future of modern Russia. They say that for a long time in
Western historiography, and, unfortunately, in the
domestic, and plant abstracts, not only contrary to the
truth, archival materials and documents, but also the
common logic. In particular, the article in question of
who is to blame for fueling the war - the Soviet Union
and Germany, Stalin or Hitler? The authors argue that,
despite some external similarities in politics and
ideology of the two historical actors of Stalin and Hitler,
the two totalitarian regimes, it is really only superficial
similarities. The authors show that it is the ideology and
politics of fascism and Nazism became the primary
cause of the outbreak of Hitler started World War II, and
then the attack on the Soviet Union. The article stated a
direct continuity between past and present Nazi fascism,
emerging after the coup in the Ukraine with the direct
support of the West. The article analyzes and that
assistance provided by the Soviet Union and its allies in
the anti-Hitler Germany - United States and Britain.
Without belittling their contribution to winning, the
authors, however, have proved a decisive role of our
country in it
The authors in the article reveal the highlights of the
history associated with the prehistory of the Great
Patriotic War of 1941 - 1945, its tragical beginning in
the first few months and its further course, up to the
Great Victory in May of 1945. They dwell on the
analysis of the causes of the Second World War and the
Great Patriotic War of the Soviet people against Hitler
Germany. The authors, in spite of liars and forgers,
show who is to blame for their unleashing and clearly
indicate that the Second World War was unleashed by
Hitler, through and in fact with the blessing of Western
powers and especially Britain and France, carried out
the policy of "appeasement" the aggressor, and ended
the Munich Agreement of 1938. The authors pay special
attention to the Treaty of Non-Aggression between
Germany and the USSR, signed on August 23, 1939,
known as the Molotov - Ribbentrop Pact. They argue
that this was a necessary step on the part of the Soviet
Union and that this agreement, Stalin was trying to gain
time and delay the beginning of the war against Nazi
Germany. The authors show that Stalin and the Soviet
leadership were perfectly aware of the fact that on 1
September 1939, Hitler attacked Poland and then it
would be the USSR. Considering the progress, results
and lessons of the Great Patriotic War of 1941-1945, the
authors elaborate and criticize the information
widespread in Western historiography, as well as, first
and foremost, in terms of the Soviet-Russian, lies,
slander and all kinds of insinuations about the Great
Patriotic war
The authors have devoted some of its controversial aspects,
which have been going on for decades in the scientific
community, namely, the time-frame of the Civil War, its
causes and about the time of its beginning. In addition to
these issues, the article is considered the relationship
between the socialist parties and their participation in the
civil war, the role of foreign intervention in the case of
incitement to war and, finally, the reasons of the defeat of
the White movement. The authors did not set out to
elaborate on all four stages of the civil war, and focused on
the examination of its first phase, covering the period from
the end of May to November 1918. The main object of
consideration the question arose about the beginning of the
Civil War. The authors dwell on the various points of view
expressed in this historical science, argues with those of
them who, in their opinion, do not withstand scientific
scrutiny. They speculate about details of alternative
embodiments of the historical process, try to consider the
option that could have been avoided civil war, if there was a
coalition of socialist parties and come to the conclusion that
such a coalition was impossible and it looks ephemeral. The
authors dwell on the consideration of the role that is played
in the raging civil fratricidal war, foreign intervention. They
rightly point out that it is military intervention exacerbated
and intensified civil war, has extended its time frame, the
number of dead and wounded, even more glowing civil and
class hatred
2017 was declared the year of the "100th anniversary
of the Great Russian Revolution", or else it is called
the "Great Russian Revolution". Such a message was
given to the Address of the President of our country,
V.V. Putin to the Federal Assembly of the Russian
Federation. The authors in the article rightly and
reasonably point out that if the February bourgeois
revolution, despite a number of objective reasons, was
still the apex, palace take-over, October of 1917 was
precisely a revolution, and not some kind of Bolshevik
conspiracy. Why a revolution, not a take-over? The
authors prove and convince the reader that this was
essentially an inter-information socialist revolution,
which radically changed the social system and the
form of ownership. The article proves that the palace
coup, which took place in February and brought
"politicians into dress coats" to power, led to the
victory of October 1917 due to their inaction and
incompetence in the country's political leadership.
None of the exciting question: about the war, peace,
land, factories and factories, the form of state
structure, the Provisional Government was not
allowed. Therefore, due to objective and subjective
reasons, the victory of the Great October Socialist
Revolution broke out