Scientific Journal of KubSAU

The article describes the main directions of the civil service reform in the Russian Federation. An analysis is made of the causes and consequences of changes introduced to the legislation at the present stage of development of Russian society

The article considers the issue of correlation of criminal and administrative responsibility. There are various points on the vision of this problem. The main legal gaps that prevent the delineation of an administrative offense and a crime are revealed

The ongoing administrative reform in Russia has been carried out with the help of modern technology and human resources and it has a significant impact on the staff of the civil service - civil servants. This article presents the position of the Government of the Russian Federation, according to which the establishment of effective contract - one of the ways of development, improve the remuneration system for civil servants, public servants themselves assessment of this innovation, presented the implementation of effective regulatory framework contract is indicated by its ideology. The factor affecting the wages of civil servants is a performance indicator; the article lists its views. In different departments, employee performance is evaluated differently in the article presents an assessment of the effectiveness of them. The evaluation of the implementation of effective contract Sergei Filatov, who served as President of the socio-economic and intellectual programs and Dmitry Abzalov - President of the Center for Strategic Communications. Also there was shown the analysis of public servants’ understanding, feasibility and impact of introducing effective contract in the state structures. We have proposed measures to address misunderstandings of the reform civil servants. There are findings as well as possible scenarios after the establishment of effective contract

This article focuses on the economic activities of legal entities as subjects of administrative responsibility. The article considers the peculiarities of this type of liability applicable to legal persons. The purpose of this article is to study the legislative framework of this institution, identifying the distinguishing features of this type of liability. Despite an adequate regulation of the legal status of the entity in various legal acts, there are many debatable issues. This topic is relevant, because now there is freedom of economic activity and the institution of administrative responsibility appeared relatively recently in our legislation. All this creates an increasing number of offenses by organizations whose actions impinge on the public relations protected by the norms of administrative law. The most debatable issue is the mental element of the offence which guilt. We found that identifying guilt of a legal entity with the guilt of individuals does not seem appropriate. Guilt of a legal entity is of the greatest interest. There are several theories concerning this element subjective side. This article describes the main provisions of the theories expressed by many scientists in the field of administrative law. All the above demonstrates the need for studies of this type of legal responsibility and improving of the Institute of administrative law

The article analyzes the stages of formation of Institute of state and municipal service in the Russian state. The analysis of the problems has identified in the process of implementation of this institution and the direct correlation of the level of professional training of employees and quality of the implementing service. We consequently suggest ways to improve the training of state and municipal employees

The concept, essence, value and classification of financial-legal norms are considered in the article. The special attention is paid to detection of peculiarities of these norms allowing delimiting them from norms of other branches of the law. The article emphasizes the fact that the direct purpose of the financial law norms is defined by a subject of the financial-legal regulation that is the relations arising in the process of public financial activities for regulation of formation, distribution and use of public funds of money. The authors’ opinion is reasoned about the fact that financial-legal norms are seldom arise as actual one because rules of conduct very rarely developed in social life as a prototype of the financial-legal norms. This circumstance is caused by the fact that financial relations do not exist and do not arise by it; these relations are shown in the forms determined by the state (municipalities) and depend primarily on social needs which are determined by a level of development of the commodity-money relations, extent of the state activity, social problems and so on. Besides, authors explore the reasons of instability of the financial law norms. In addition, in this article the authors’ opinion about action mechanism of the financial law norms as very actual phenomenon in modern Russia is reasoned. Due to the fact that the budget system of the country is under the influence of financial-legal norms, with help of such norms state extra-budgetary social funds formed and used, monetary and exchange rate policy carried out, so the need of deeper study of these norms and understanding their action mechanism is very actual phenomenon in modern Russia

The article considers the ratio of the fundamental principles of the state and municipal services at the present stage of development of the state. It shows the problem concerning the possibility of expanding the list of these principles in the Federal laws and their harmonization

The analysis of the legislation of local government during this period confirms urgency of consideration issues about legal regulation of the local governments’ status. The provided review of the legislation of local management system and self-government allows to make a number of conclusions about future system of municipal authorities

Today, in Russia, there are many processes of reforming local government. One of the most pressing issues in this area of legislation is the institution of city manager. This article contains the distinctive features of the voting of City Manager, requirements for a candidate for the position, rights, duties and powers, opinions of scientists on the issue in the sphere of local government, City Manager abroad, the question of the legal status of City Manager in the Kuban region and our own position about the problem. The purpose and objective of this work is to study legislation in this area, display trend developing, drawing up the positive and negative aspects of local government reform. We used a number of different levels of laws regulating relations of Municipality. For example, such as 131- FZ about Local Self-Government, the Criminal Code, the law on local self-government in the Kuban region, as well as sentences of courts of different instances. A distinctive feature of this article is the responsibility of City Manager, and exactly what is waiting for if he breaks the law, and also judicial review

In this research, we discuss promoting and rewarding of civil servants. These methods represent system stimulants that affect the needs and interests of the public civil servant in order to induce him to conscientiously carrying out their duties. It is concluded that awarding and promotion are important parts of the incentive scheme for civil servants, because they show how faithfully and efficiently citizens do their job, and these methods pave the way for this fellow citizen doing their job perfectly. We must mention the material benefits obtained by a civil servant usually in the form of encouragement. It should be noted that in recent years actively updated current legislation has been promoting and rewarding measures that are established by different public authorities, which gives law enforcers more options in choosing the measures of rewarding and encouraging, relevant to labor achievements of citizens. The main legal source is the Law of 27 July 2004 N-79 "On State Civil Service of the Russian Federation,"[1] which established an indicative list of awards and rewards of public civil servant