Scientific Journal of KubSAU

Polythematic online scientific journal
of Kuban State Agrarian University
ISSN 1990-4665
AGRIS logo UlrichsWeb logo DOAJ logo

Name

Kamyshanskiy Vladimir Pavlovich

Scholastic degree


Academic rank

professor

Honorary rank

—

Organization, job position

Kuban State Agrarian University
   

Web site url

—

Email

—


Articles count: 7

373 kb

ABUSE OF RIGHT: CONCEPT, SIGNS, GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS

abstract 1121508141 issue 112 pp. 1967 – 1987 30.10.2015 ru 1102
The article is devoted to one of the most disputable categories of jurisprudence – abuse of rights. Modern civil legislation contains many of the assessment law. Interpretation and specification of evaluative concepts is a challenging intellectual process. Abuse of right is a consequence of the process of interpretation of appraisal standards. The law does not allow the exercise of civil rights with the intent to harm another person, as well as abuse of rights in any form, including in the form of circumvention of the law. The author regards as the already known issues with the application of the principle of the inadmissibility of abuse of the right, so new in connection with the amendments to the Civil code of the Russian Federation. In particular the principle of good faith is investigated as a fundamental principle for civil rights. The article is devoted to the question on the essence and the legal nature of circumvention of the law, as well as the notion of circumvention of the law with unlawful purpose as a form of abuse of right. On the basis of the study presents the author's notion of circumvention of the right. The authors have made a conclusion that the correct interpretation of the categories of "subjective property law and protected by law interest" is the key to understanding the notion of abuse of right. The conscientiousness of participants of civil relations, as well as the intelligence is the proper limits of lawful behavior of the subject civil relationship, the breach of which allows detecting the signs of abuse of subjective civil law
122 kb

CATEGORY OF CIRCUMVENTION OF THE LAW IN RUSSIAN CIVIL LAW

abstract 1011407120 issue 101 pp. 1824 – 1832 30.09.2014 ru 987
This article examines the concept of "circumvention of the law" with respect to Treaty law. The author finds that the direct loan category "circumvention of the law" in Treaty law can be estimated ambiguously. The specified category which is fragmentary reflected in the active Civil codex indicates a regulatory gap
189 kb

CIVIL REGULATION OF USING RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCES

abstract 0921308036 issue 92 pp. 542 – 563 31.10.2013 ru 1832
This article deals with civil regulation of using renewable energy sources. To deal with such items we need to understand a clear definition of this concept and to consider the specifics of Public-Private Partnership in such claims
112 kb

LIABILITY FOR BREACH OF SHAREHOLDER AGREEMENT

abstract 0801206007 issue 80 pp. 81 – 91 30.06.2012 ru 1743
The article analyzes company law rules providing for liability for non-performance of shareholder agreements. Ways to protect shareholders` right are reviewed
139 kb

SOME FEATURES OF THE RELATIONSHIP OF CIVIL LIABILITY OF PUBLIC ENTITIES

abstract 1011407146 issue 101 pp. 2188 – 2198 30.09.2014 ru 1227
The article deals with the civil liability of public entities as a kind of civil legal relationships. We have analyzed the features of this relationship in comparison with a common understanding of civil liability legal relationship, which is not complicated with public-law entity
163 kb

THE CONCEPT AND SOURCES OF CIVIL LAW REGULATION OF ENERGY SAVING

abstract 1011407092 issue 101 pp. 1428 – 1440 30.09.2014 ru 1055
The article discusses the concept of energy efficiency as an object of civil rights. It examines the characteristic features of the object of civil legal relations. On the basis of the current sources of the civil law we have analyzed the sources of civil law regulation of energy saving
170 kb

THE CONTENTS OF BUILDING LEASEHOLD

abstract 1131509120 issue 113 pp. 1697 – 1714 30.11.2015 ru 443
The article is devoted to one of the most disputable categories of jurisprudence – to the contents of Building leasehold. In the article there has been presented the research of the legal nature of the institution of building leasehold (superficies). There have been traced the particulars of formation of the Roman legal (classical) model of building leasehold and the interpretation of this institution in foreign civil legislation. It has been noted that certain countries apply the classical Roman model of building leasehold while others use the model of "the shared property" of the land plot and of the piece of the estate built on this plot. There was conducted the analysis of the German model inheritance law of building leasehold on the basis of which there was made the conclusion about its independent nature and uniqueness. The historical and the comparative legal methods of the research have enabled to identify the essential differences of the employed models of building leasehold and the specific features of their application in the countries of roman-germanic law and in the Commonwealth of Independent States. There have been studied the approaches of the domestic civilized doctrine in terms of building leasehold and the specific features of its implementation in the draft version of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation. There has been affirmed that the draft version of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation admits the existence of the two models of the building leasehold: the design one and the classical one. There has been applied critical approach to the analysis of the design model of building leasehold in comparison with its Roman and Germanic legal constructions; there have been presented recommendations for its improvement. It is proposed to abandon the temporary ownership of the premises in the building constructed based on the Treaty on the law of the land. We proposed to replace it with a specific property right – "right of superficies". Its essence consists in the right of possession and use of facilities of a building constructed in accordance with the Treaty on the law of the land
ßíäåêñ.Ìåòðèêà