Scientific Journal of KubSAU

A method is considered, on the concrete example of hothouses of type of 6D, for calculation of bearing strength of overhead and lower belts of farms of coverage. The vital necessity of deep analysis of the question of bearing strength appeared in the light of satisfied mass erection of hothouses constructions of which are bought in the countries of Near East. However, a simple transfer of constructions of hothouses made in the countries of Near East can not be successful on the territory of the Russian Federation. These constructions of hothouses can not be maintained in some conditions, according to service exploitation, like snow loadings, in other cases - wind loadings, and in third case, a construction can collapse without visible reasons. The conducted successive static, dynamic and seismic analysis, executed due to the normative documents and the norms of supplier operating on the territory of the Russian Federation, in attachment to the real sections of bearings structural elements, allowed us expose the stated below percentage of the use of the examined elements of constructions. Lower belt of farms of coverage: on the norms of the Russian Federation, on the first maximum state percent of the use – 395 %; there is a percent of the use on the second maximum state – 999 %; on the norms of the Russian Federation taking into account loadings of supplier, on the first maximum state percent of the use – 339,3 %; there is a percent of the use on the second maximum state – 999 %. Overhead belt of farms of coverage: on the norms of the Russian Federation, on the first maximum state percent of the use – 495,2%; there is a percent of the use on the second maximum state – 361,4 %; on the norms of the Russian Federation taking into account loadings of supplier, on the first maximum state percent of the use – 150,8 %; there is a percent of the use on the second maximum state – 146,2%. Analysis presented allows establishing that at the load of overhead and lower belts of farms of coverage of hothouses, by combinations of loadings characteristic for the place of location of hothouse of type of 6d, their bearing strength, and buildings in general can not be provided

We have reviewed the methodology on a specific example of greenhouses of type 6D, the calculation of the bearing capacity of the upper and bottom zones roof trusses. The urgent need for in-depth analysis of the issue bearing capacity appeared in the light of a rather massive construction of greenhouses, especially in the Southern Federal District, as its constructive is purchased in the Middle East. However, the simple transfer of designs greenhouses made in the Middle East, to the territory of the Russian Federation is not completed successfully. These structures cannot withstand greenhouses in some cases, according to the service manual, snow loads, in other cases, wind loads, and in the third case, the construct may be destroyed for no apparent reason. Need to clarify the situation become clearer. Successive static, dynamic and seismic analysis carried out by force in the territory of the Russian Federation regulations and norms provider in relation to the actual sections bearing structural elements, revealed The following percentages of use of structural elements under consideration. According to the standards of the Russian Federation, for the first limit of the percentage of use - 395%; the second limit of the percentage of use - 999%; according to the norms of the Russian Federation with the load provider for the first limit of the percentage of use - 339.3%; the second limit of the percentage of use - 999%. The upper chord coating: according to the standards of the Russian Federation, for the first limit of the percentage of use - 495.2%; the second limit of the percentage of use - 361.4%; according to the norms of the Russian Federation with the load provider for the first limit of the percentage of use - 150.8%; the second limit of the percentage of use - 146.2%. The analysis presented allows us to conclude that when uploading the upper and lower zones of farms covering greenhouses, load combinations specific to the location of the greenhouse type 6D, their carrying capacity and hence the structure as a whole is not guaranteed

In this article on the example of the three-floor building the offered method of the analysis of safety of the structures, based on the complex and individual accounting of a combination of loadings is considered

In the article we consider the features of the analysis of the condition of buildings at incomplete construction in difficult hydrogeological conditions

In the article the features of the analysis of a number of design decisions are considered at a substandard condition of a seventeen-floor residential building