The article is devoted to the objects of practice and
theory of the means of individualization of legal entities.
Individualization of a legal entity - it is when it is
allocated from the mass of all the other organizations.
A legal person acts under its brand name, which is
defined in its founding documents and is included in
the state register. The main function of the means of
individualization - select an object or a subject of the
total weight of the homogeneous objects or subjects.
Legal regulation and the legal protection provided by
international regulations and legislation in different
countries. The high relevance of the topic because it is
the development of today's world market and contributes
to increasing the role and need for individualization
of goods and means of legal protection
This article discusses the basic tendencies of development of the civil law authorities under the influence of globalization and integration processes
The article analyzes company law rules providing for liability for non-performance of shareholder agreements. Ways to protect shareholders` right are reviewed
The article reveals Lenin's idea of nationalization, which was justified by Lenin at the end of 19th and early 20th centuries on the basis of the Marxist doctrine. The author has shown that (supported by the Russian Social-Democratic Party (Bolsheviks)), this idea has become materialized, leading to the fact that all the land was declared public property, one of the state fund, which on behalf of the State can be disposed by the Soviet authorities of different levels
The legal entities of the preliminary investigation agencies that are authorized to make decisions and draw regulations at this stage are an investigator, a detective, the Head of the investigative division, the supervisor of the investigative body, a prosecutor. The requirement for the legality of the regulations issued by the above-mentioned legal entities develops with the initiation of the criminal case. Such requirement is applied to the decisions made by an investigator or a detective under the common rule
In the article we reveal the basic problems of forming the legal basis of public control over the activities of public authorities. The relevance of this topic has been steadily increasing due to the increasing influence of civil society on the decisions made by public authorities. The authors analyze the provisions of the Federal Law "On the basis of public control in the Russian Federation", the regional laws, to fix the foundations of social control in some subjects of the federation, as well as other legal acts in this area. Special attention is paid to the formulation of the concept of social control and the conclusion of the need legislative consolidation of the concept of "individual public authority 'and a common list of agencies and organizations that operate them. Analyzing the law enshrined in the range of subjects of public control, the authors substantiate the feasibility of incorporating the Advisory Board at the government and public experts. On the basis of the provisions of the law, in this work we have determined the legal status of the subjects of social control, their powers and procedures of the in collaboration with the authorities, as well as the legal framework for the implementation of certain forms of social control. It is proposed to expand the interaction of subjects of public control with prosecutors by holding regular meetings to expand the powers of public monitoring commissions for visiting places of detention
The authors of the article consider and analyze various
points of view upon hereditary legal relationship and
the nature of universal succession to the inheritance.
The matter of hereditary legal relationship appears due
to the death of the testator. Hereditary legal
relationship arises on various bases, which grow from
the facts: discovery of inheritance, acceptance of
inheritance, refusal of inheritance, execution of the
will, hereditary transmission and other legal
relationship. The authors come to the conclusion that
the change of the testator as subject in any of the legal
relationship existed during his lifetime is impossible
without the whole complex of the hereditary relations,
and while some (the relations on protection of
hereditary property, division, etc.) can be avoided in
the course of transition of hereditary property, the
others (discovery of inheritance, acceptance of
inheritance) are necessary. In each legal relationship
the successor perceives the whole legal situation of the
testator, that is in each legal relationship the rights
which are the object of the relation will be passed to
him. The contents of hereditary legal relationship
claim that inheritance represents the transition order
protected by the law after the death of a citizen
(testator) of the things owned by him on the right of a
private property, the property, and also property rights
and duties to one or several persons (successors) as
universal succession. In the case of universal
hereditary succession, the rights and duties are passed
to the successor with one act, without a transfer by
their first owner, and the passed rights and duties
continue to be estimated on the identity of the first
owner. Finally the authors come to the conclusion that
universality designates transition of the rights as well
as the testator’s duties (except those inseparably linked
with the identity of the testator) as a whole when the
successor can't selectively accept some rights and
duties, having refused the others. Restriction of
responsibility of the successor for the testator's debts
with the size of hereditary volume does not change the
essence of universal succession in this regard
The legal responsibility of judicial department’s officials – one of central elements of their legal status, which main aim is raise office discipline level in system of judicial power of the pre-revolutionary Russian state
This article is explored the legal and organizational bases of development activity. The article considers the system of legislation regulating construction and development activities
The article examines the problems of civil servants’ disciplinary responsibility in pre-revolutionary Russia. The specified legal institute during that period had close interrelation with criminal responsibility institute as the legislation accurately didn’t divide disciplinary and a criminal responsibility. In the pre-revolutionary period had been laid by the legislator generally, the system of norms and rules, which was called to improve the quality of government, a level of service discipline, an authority of public service had been formed