This article discusses issues of legal regulation and implementation of the norms of the forest legislation about procedure of holding the auction for granting the forest lot in rent and also consider the problem of law enforcement procedure. According to the forest legislation of the Russian Federation, the basis of the conclusion of the lease contract of the wood lot the result of the carried-out auction is. Auction can be considered as one-stage process on the one hand and as two-stage on the other hand. In this regard, auction is considered in this work from the different points of view of prominent scientists. The conclusion is drawn on imperfection of the system of carrying out auctions indulging corruption about need of change of criteria of a choice of the winner of auction where by the main criterion it is put, for example, the qualifying shots of the person, but not the greatest sum which the person can offer at competition. The position about the privilege to the conclusion of the lease contract at an equal rate of a payment is opened. Auction and competition as real and effective ways of receiving the right for the conclusion of the lease contract of the timberland are correlated with each other. Proposals on recognition by winners in auctions of potential tenants which for several years showed the reliability
The article is devoted to a proof work of a court at the stage of the court investigation
The concept of long-term social and economic development of the Russian Federation declares that in Russia, the society based on trust and responsibility that will be reached at the expense of provision of equal possibilities for social mobility of talented representatives of all social classes, social policy realization, on support of vulnerable levels of population and carrying out of the policy directed on integration of migrants should be generated
The article describes some main scientific and
practical recommendations of the group methodology
of the investigation by questioning witnesses in cases
of crimes against family and minors
In the article we have investigated the features of process of planning, organization and targeting of judicial examination. The mutual relation of the concepts of “planning” and “organization” is considered. A number of theoretical provisions and the
practical recommendations used in judicial proceedings are presented
Данная статья посвящена гражданским делам, рассматриваемым судами и связанным с признанием права собственности на самовольную постройку. Для рассмотрения подобных споров необходимо уяснить четкое определение самовольной постройки, рассмотреть специфику исков о признании права собственности на нее, а также основания, связанные с признанием права собственности на самовольную постройку
The article is devoted to the main basis of exemption from criminal responsibility in connection of reconciliation with the victim. The essence of conciliation is analyzed, its features are determined, the definition is given. The necessity of its consolidation in criminal law is established
In this article we define the place of the case in aleatory contracts. The conclusion is that the case in aleatory constructions plays a regulative role in the relationship of the parties. Regulatory functions in the case of aleatory contracts are manifested in the fact that the legal consequences of the transaction and its economic results determined random event, which is designed to allow the outcome of the transaction
The competitiveness principle is answered to the full with a situation when proofs the charge party at first represents, then - the protection party, and each of them proves legitimacy of the conclusion and criticises arguments of the opponent. The court definitively should solve, what proofs to reject and what to accept and to pronounce on their basis the sentence. Meanwhile in a criminal trial science separate authors believe, that research of proofs in competitive order practically appears impracticable. The article of the author is devoted to these and other problems
The article is devoted to the analysis of the legislation
on criminal liability for acquisition, storage,
transportation, processing for sale or it is sold
obviously illegally prepared wood. It is investigated
the main and qualifying signs of the corpus delicti
provided by Art. 191.1 of the criminal code of Russian
Federation, and features of legislative technology of
creation of norm on responsibility for this crime. Some
problems of qualification of the specified crime and its
separation from adjacent structures of crimes are noted